--nextPart1476141.Em04WvUUIn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:22, Ben Burton wrote: > It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't > heard back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not > really much that we can do. =20 I know that Bernd was about to change his job some months ago, but I can=20 try to conact him on the mail addresses I know of. > AFAICT he hasn't been around for a few=20 > years now; does anyone know of a way that we might be able to contact > him?=20 I met him ~1.5 years ago personally and we exchanged some personal mails=20 during the last year as well, so as I said I will try to contact him. > Given that the QPL is GPL-incompatible, this raises issues for GPLed > programs that wish to use this kpart. I believe this at least > includes quanta and kdevelop (unless I'm mistaken). I don't think that using a GPL incompatible KPart in a GPL application=20 is a problem. It may be at the corner case, but this is more like=20 writing a GPL frontend to a non-GPL application. Also KParts are=20 usually not a hard requirement, so embedding application are working=20 fine without them as well. Using the Cervisia DCOP services which requires inclusion and link=20 against it might be real problem though, but as far as I know both=20 Quanta and KDevelop can be compiled without the CVS part that requires=20 the Cervisia DCOP services. Quanta can be for sure. ;-) > Though IMHO (i) would be preferable, since (ii) involves many more > people and still raises issues for any other GPLed code that kdevelop > and/or quanta might be linked with. We cannot change the license for the whole Quanta due to its nature=20 (some developers left the project and went commercial...), but it IS=20 possible to change the part of the code that uses the Cervisia part and=20 DCOP services. The first was written by a developer who is no longer=20 active, but I'm sure reachable and cooperative, and myself, the part=20 using the DCOP services was entirely written by myself. I'm not sure if=20 it's enough to change the license only for these parts of the code=20 though. Andras =2D-=20 Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org --nextPart1476141.Em04WvUUIn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCOLyNTQdfac6L/08RAgc4AJ90A5aj6t9ztz9Y9N5ELt+mRPZtFACeJoc+ Ddtp9Pk2l4lRyxvKSKTTmp4= =BzE0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1476141.Em04WvUUIn--