On Sunday 13 March 2005 21:50, Leo Savernik wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 13. März 2005 11:07 schrieb Brad Hards:
> >
> > Has anyone looked at how much of glib we need? It might be interesting to
> > see if we can re-implement the most useful parts of the glib API in
> > Qt4...
>
> Wow, a glib abstraction layer! That's the best idea I've ever heard on the
> subject. This is indeed the only sane way we avoid needless duplication,
> and still be able to make the most out of libraries or applications
> originally designed for gnome.
>
I love sarcasm ;-)

`Allan