On Sunday 27 Feb 2005 18:17, Andras Mantia wrote: > On Sunday 27 February 2005 20:09, Maks Orlovich wrote: > > An alternative is something like this: > > If this is BC (and looks like so, nice trick!), I'd vote for it. So this is BC because it replaces one pointer with another and puts the extra members into the new Private struct? If I understand this correctly I'll make the same fix in KIMProxy. Will -- Will Stephenson IRC: Bille