[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Build system (was Re: Future of KDE Development)
From: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer () gmx ! de>
Date: 2005-02-21 15:25:23
Message-ID: 200502211625.24227.Josef.Weidendorfer () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
On Monday 21 February 2005 15:07, Michael Matz wrote:
> As you know I'm very fond of Makefile.am syntax. The easy declarative
> one. Not the local- targets, and not conditionals. In fact I'm (like
> Dirk) more fond of an extremely restrictive syntax for the build
> description, not so much of the actual Makefile.am syntax itself (although
> I do like it).
...
> parse them). OTOH, if we do this we could also stay with Makefile.am
> (restricted in some aspects, elaborated in others (like now)).
Hi,
Write a Makefile.am interpreter for Scons (and contribute to the Scons team),
which can cover 95% of our current Makefile.am's. For configure.in.in use
Scons instead. [The Scons FAQ already tells about the possibility to include
a Makefile interpreter.]
IDEs still touch Makefile.am only, people don't have to learn much new, and
existing Makefile.ams hopefully can rest almost untouched.
Is this feasable?
Josef
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic