--nextPart369575071.xVkGgRrY3n
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:52 am, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:50, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > And you're saying so far we always rejected any kind of help to
> > port KDE to FreeBSD and Solaris?
> i am a little dismayed at the fact that you would interpret my offer
> to work on, and help with, these portability problems, for KDE 4 as
> some sort of insidious negative comment about KDE.
Breath in, wait, breath out.

OK, we are talking in the abstract. As far as I can see, no-one has a=20
conceptual objection to having support for any particular platform (be it=20
Windows, MacOS, Linux, *BSD, Solaris, HP-UX, whatever).

Stefan: I think you have agreement to, and general support for, any changes=
=20
that make KDE more portable, subject to meeting normal standards for code=20
quality, and not introducing breakage. Coolo's wording might have failed th=
e=20
language barrier test - I read it as "hey, we already do that", rather than=
 a=20
criticism. Also, if they gave me a CVS account, I'm sure they'll give you=20
one :-)

Is there something in particular that needs to be done to the development=20
process for KDE4? If so, please describe the issue and proposed solution,=20
since I think you have an attentive audience. If not, Waldo's suggestion=20
(roughly "if it isn't obvious what to do, turn up to kde-core-devel and=20
discuss it") sounds like the best way forward.

--nextPart369575071.xVkGgRrY3n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCFUgpGwwszQ/PZzgRAoUcAJ4u+4q0xqT8z/0jIyf8Emy8OSg9uACdGwEW
yhTNTiAN0b3h4GlRGsOrA1w=
=GYTa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart369575071.xVkGgRrY3n--