From kde-core-devel  Thu Feb 17 09:31:46 2005
From: Andras Mantia <amantia () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:31:46 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Subversion problems
Message-Id: <200502171131.52800.amantia () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=110863272902601
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2503399.3s4nQR35lN"

--nextPart2503399.3s4nQR35lN
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:10, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Now I would like to have some input on the problems we face. Would
> you prefer to not loose the date<->revision mapping or doesn't it
> matter?

I used update to date quite often when trying to find out when was a bug=20
introduced. It was a nice functionality and I'd miss it.

Andras

=2D-=20
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org

--nextPart2503399.3s4nQR35lN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCFGSITQdfac6L/08RAsDTAJ9tWPdQmIWodxlqvDuTecNY5K0osACgxshQ
VCk1ojAPIOxIZe+yeBwZyi4=
=cBZc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2503399.3s4nQR35lN--