From kde-core-devel Mon Feb 14 07:57:25 2005 From: "Aaron J. Seigo" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:57:25 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: thoughts on the systray Message-Id: <200502140057.37330.aseigo () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=110836797425017 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart4751038.pN17mvUHt8" --nextPart4751038.pN17mvUHt8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 13 February 2005 06:12, G=C3=A1bor Lehel wrote: > In my opinion the problem isn't apps embedding themselves in the tray > for the sole purpose of being embedded in the tray per se, as it can > be useful and there's certainly situations where the user might want > it, but rather that it is left to each app to decide this and not the > user -- who is then stuck with some apps which are always in the > systray, and others (s)he can't get out of it. we have systray icon hiding and a proper systray spec would make that a lot= =20 more powerful. if we them remove the icons that shouldn't be there from the= ir=20 applications i think a lot of these issues will evaporate. our HIG will nee= d=20 to cover what's not appropriate in the systray. > My thought was to have some sort of KWin-titlebar-action for this, > combining it with a few other things (possibly including but not > limited to, on all desktops, keep above others, etc.), essentially a > way for the user to say 'this app is important'. That way the user > gets total control over which apps are in the systray, and which > aren't. i think this belongs more in the taskbar than the systray. > (Or, rambling now, maybe have a seperate area for these sorts=20 > of apps, to seperate them from the 'notification area' -- maybe also for the record, i'm not happy with the term 'notification area' because it= =20 doesn't reflect reality. if we remove the context menus from the system tra= y,=20 users will lynch us (well, me. they blame me for everything in kicker these= =20 days, no matter who does it =3DP ), and if we leave the context menus there= =20 it's more than just notification. moreover, "notification" immediately limits what people can do with the=20 systray. i'd rather say what is not acceptable in the tray rather than what= =20 is and allow our application devs to come up with creative ideas that don't= =20 fall within the realm of the "do nots". negative space vs. positive space = =3D) > replace their taskbar entry entirely with an icon in this area...). and break UI consistency. no, let's not copy MacOS X here please.=20 User: "why are only SOME of my windows in the taskbar?"=20 =2D-=20 Aaron J. Seigo GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 --nextPart4751038.pN17mvUHt8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCEFnx1rcusafx20MRAm5rAJsGm7c6A0n/GyKIJWRMi0lNkePyqACfZp5b /xmHiQw+p/spa/bP9LM9zJE= =ZUas -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4751038.pN17mvUHt8--