--nextPart11429821.f1VZMxpD90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dirk Mueller wrote: >On Sunday 13 February 2005 04:02, you wrote: >> Moved ipv6blacklist to work only on non-IPv4 hosts. This way, this can >> no longer be considered for "adblocking", but it can be used to kill >> broken sites. >> >> The old feature of full blocking is no longer present. > >why was it removed? any complains? Let me explain better, because other people have asked. I introduced the blacklist feature to get around broken DNS servers, that=20 would drop or somehow return wrong answers for IPv6 lookups. My=20 understanding is that we shouldn't talk at all to those servers and=20 simply say that anything under those domains doesn't exist. However, it was argued that some sites that are problematic are the very=20 sites people want to access, such as banking sites. Instead of adding a new blacklist, I simply moved the functionality of the= =20 existing one. Now it avoids sending IPv6 queries in most cases -- there=20 is still one case it will send, but it's very rare and I don't think=20 there's any KDE code using it. That in turn means that normal IPv4=20 queries go through untouched. The end result is that the ipv6blacklist file can no longer be used as an=20 adblocker list -- a functionality it was never intended to do in the=20 first place. =2D-=20 Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira (DOT) info PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 3. Ac seo woruld wear=C3=B0 geborod, sw=C3=A1 se Scieppend cwea=C3=B0 "Gewu= rde Unix" and=20 wundor fremede and him "Unix" genemned, =C3=BE=C3=A6t is se rihtendgesamnun= g. --nextPart11429821.f1VZMxpD90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCD1l1M/XwBW70U1gRAr2kAJ45Q28/SN4S+GgaaV2Tti5wshansACdHUqv wDBbM3N7MtKJrobKoLysxFM= =YzF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11429821.f1VZMxpD90--