[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: KIO->GnomeVFS bridge started (looking for a Common-VFS)
From:       Leo Savernik <l.savernik () aon ! at>
Date:       2004-12-21 20:53:51
Message-ID: 200412212154.06420.l.savernik () aon ! at
[Download RAW message or body]


Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 19:49 schrieb Jason Keirstead:
> > I think using KIOSlave code inside Gnome-VFS is definitely a good idea.
> > But i would not use them as they are, but rather write a C++ porting
> > layer on top of the Gnome-VFS modules concept which almost acts like the
> > SlaveBase class, but without Qt stuff inside. Porting them should be
> > possible, because the Qt bindings of io-slaves are not very strong.
>
> Why would you want take the existing KDE code, write a porting layer, and
> move it to GVFS? (and then, I assume, port KIO to use GVFS?) All you are
> doing is introducing additional code paths and potential bugs in the
> slaves.

Heh. This reminds me of the discussion to make Qt being based on gtk2 for 
drawing and event handling. First I thought the guy was making a joke, but in 
the course of the discussion I realised he was dead serious.

Luckily, no coding was ever done on that attempt :-)

mfg
 Leo

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]