From kde-core-devel Tue Dec 07 18:49:43 2004 From: Martin Koller Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:49:43 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: XML/XSD based configuration files. Message-Id: <200412071949.47755.m.koller () surfeu ! at> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=110244543122734 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1134927.Kp9Us3q1B6" --nextPart1134927.Kp9Us3q1B6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 07 December 2004 19:16, Aaron Seigo wrote: > 0) default configuration file format > > besides speed gained by the simplicity of the .ini format, it's a very > human friendly format. people can easily find and change settings as > needed. XML is not nearly as human friendly, and i think that's an > important thing to keep in mind as well. I second that! Beside that: What advantage would an XML format bring and for whom ? If it is only KDE who accesses these files, then who cares about the format= ? I would say, the most important thing is simplicity/speed. Has somebody usecases for file access beside from KDE classes ? P.S.:Also have a look at the elektra project: http://elektra.sourceforge.n= et/ "The objective of the Elektra Project is to help create a pervasive,=20 ubiquitous configuration system. " =2D-=20 Best regards/Sch=F6ne Gr=FC=DFe Martin () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail=20 /\ - against microsoft attachments Some operating systems are called 'user friendly', Linux however is 'expert friendly'. --nextPart1134927.Kp9Us3q1B6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBtftLUeHBRvgua64RAgwzAJ989YzAzpGdPg8fRsLrrsd17FY9lgCfcbmk wi+8GpBTXXBVDP2DVK7oWKo= =CuuC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1134927.Kp9Us3q1B6--