--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2004 10:02 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
> > Yet we can argue whether it is allowed to introduce new public symbols in
> > patchlevel releases.
>
> We could, yes. But it would end up with: packages are supposed to require
> the patchlevel version they built against as minimum.

Isn't it already this way?

mfg
 Leo

--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBrv3Sj5jssenUYTsRAgQLAKDCHGTlu/86Ijbf9ANXbNtbkA2Y9ACdF5t0
N3A6CtW/LPDfDfF53/nvHLw=
=Dqok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac--