From kde-core-devel  Thu Dec 02 11:34:42 2004
From: Leo Savernik <l.savernik () aon ! at>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:34:42 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility broken? between 3.3.1 and 3.3.2
Message-Id: <200412021234.42765.l.savernik () aon ! at>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=110198698809039
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac"

--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2004 10:02 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
> > Yet we can argue whether it is allowed to introduce new public symbols in
> > patchlevel releases.
>
> We could, yes. But it would end up with: packages are supposed to require
> the patchlevel version they built against as minimum.

Isn't it already this way?

mfg
 Leo

--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBrv3Sj5jssenUYTsRAgQLAKDCHGTlu/86Ijbf9ANXbNtbkA2Y9ACdF5t0
N3A6CtW/LPDfDfF53/nvHLw=
=Dqok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2722323.VST6N9jGac--