On Saturday 27 November 2004 17:39, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2004 12:37, Richard Smith wrote:
> > Ah, I see. You mean, why bother adding a check for null in slotOK?
>
> Yeah, it's just a little redundant.
>
> > Well, obviously m_strengthBar will have been initialised if we're in
> > NewPassword mode and we're in slotOK. Obviously. But what's true now
> > isn't going to be true forever. And what's wrong with (slightly) more
> > robust code?
>
> That's fine, I was just wondering whether there's something new and
> funky going on in that code. Please commit before I go completely crazy
> because of that crash.

Looks like someone else committed a similar fix while I was asleep... you 
snooze, you lose, I guess.
-- 
Thanks,
Richard