[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] -fvisibility problems
From:       Simone Gotti <simone.gotti () email ! it>
Date:       2004-11-15 17:04:02
Message-ID: 200411151704.02878.simone.gotti () email ! it
[Download RAW message or body]


On Monday 15 November 2004 14:11, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Monday 15 November 2004 13:30, Szombathelyi György wrote:
> > Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > >> -#if __GNUC__ - 0 > 3 || (__GNUC__ - 0 == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ - 0 > 4)
> > >> +#if __GNUC__ - 0 > 3 || (__GNUC__ - 0 == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ - 0 > 3)
> > >>  /* Visibility is available for GCC newer than 3.4.
> > >>   * See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9283   */
> > >
> > > Is visibility ok now on gcc 3.3? Can anybody confirm this? If so, maybe
> > > there should be a (configure?) test for availability, I think your
> > > patch does not solve the problem for every gcc 3.4.x release can be
> > > found in distros?
> > >
> > > see "its not implemented in 3.3. or current 3.4 "
> > > comment on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9283
> >
> > greater than 3 means 4 at least, not (in my patch)?
> >
> > I don't know about early gcc 3.4, but the version is shipped with Fedore
> > Core3 (3.4.2) does support -fvisiblity.
>
> I've got g++ 3.4.2 from debian, and it does not support -fvisibility. I
> notice that in that bug report a separate commit was made to
> gcc-3_4-rhl-branch. Maybe it was backported for Red Hat only? ;-)

Also here in gentoo we have the gcc-3.4.x versions with backported 
-fvisibilty.

Bye!
-- 
Simone Gotti - Gentoo Developer
<motaboy@gentoo.org>
http://kde-bluetooth.sf.net

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]