[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Moving kfilereplace to kdeutils
From:       Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock () gmx ! net>
Date:       2004-11-12 19:06:07
Message-ID: 200411122006.08463.michaelnottebrock () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


On Friday, 12. November 2004 19:41, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 20:15, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > I suggest you stop pretending for a moment that kdevelop is the
> > center of the universe and check how many other of the kde modules
> > that make up a release do presently have _any_ inter-module
> > dependencies (except to/from kdeaddons/kdelibs).
>
> Is there any app that depends on kdeaddons?
> And regarding KDevelop & Cervisia, what is your proposal? Move Cervisia
> into kdelibs?

Move Cervisia out of KDE and into kdeextragear. If it looks like packagers 
will have to package it standalone anyway to be able to resolve the 
dependencies Quanta and KDevelop have on it properly, there's no point in 
dragging it along with kdesdk. Thinking about it, most of the recent 
additions to kdesdk really would lead a better life in KEG, kompare, 
umbrello, kcachegrind...

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]