[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] XML validity of kcfg files
From:       Frans Englich <frans.englich () telia ! com>
Date:       2004-11-04 11:10:42
Message-ID: 200411041110.43023.frans.englich () telia ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 04 November 2004 10:18, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2004 03:53, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > > CVS commit by englich:
> > > The XML Schema version of the DTD for the KConfigXT format. When it is
> > > stable we can place a copy in www/
> > >
> > > The documentation(in the file) has an example of how a proper XML
> > > document declaration should look like. Then, one can validate the
> > > KConfigXT file with `xmllint --noout --schema
> > > kdelibs/kdecore/kconfig_compiler/kcfg.xsd foo.kcfg`.
> > >
> > >   A            kcfg.xsd   1.1
> >
> > To go full circle with this thread I have committed a change to the test
> > script to use that file (if found).
> >
> > What a wild thread :)
>
> Can the DTD be removed from CVS then? 

Since we still got it at the web site, and the removal only concerns those who 
develop, I think it's cool.

I'm concerned about how much the Schema differs from the DTD. Benjamin, is 
there a difference in what kcfgs that fails when you run kdetestscripts with 
DTD and then against the Schema? I bet there is, it's just that those which 
are false positives should be fixed in the Schema.

> It should remain on the website but I 
> don't think it's a good idea to have both versions in CVS. Please also
> adjust the "check-local" target in the Makefile.

Done.

>
> Can someone tell Scripty to no longer update
> http://www.kde.org/standards/kcfg/1.0/kcfg.dtd ?

And perhaps make it update the Schema instead? (didn't know Scripty did that)


Cheers,

		Frans


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]