--nextPart1166935.EWo594Mpuo
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 15 October 2004 04:22, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (CCing debian-legal since they know better than I do.  The problem here
> is a potential conflict between GPL and BSD-with-advertising-clause; see
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=3Dkde-core-devel&m=3D109779477208076&w=3D2 for my
> original post.  The question now is whether the advertising clause can
> be assumed to be rescinded.  Any comment would be welcome.)

"Effective immediately, licensees and distributors are no longer required to
include the acknowledgement within advertising materials.  Accordingly, the
foregoing paragraph of those BSD Unix files containing it is hereby deleted
in its entirety."

So the mentioned paragraph in vm_random.c should be considered struck as pe=
r=20
July 22, 1999

Cheers,
Waldo
=2D-=20
bastian@kde.org   |   SUSE LINUX 9.2: Order now!   |   bastian@suse.com
  http://www.suse.de/us/private/products/suse_linux/preview/index.html

--nextPart1166935.EWo594Mpuo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBb5hFN4pvrENfboIRAhj2AJ4/bbtsZgynlGQr/+jdjgo029jWfgCfZeHM
o0PKDWNOUexpzMhQqwWNizA=
=w17V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1166935.EWo594Mpuo--