From kde-core-devel  Sun Oct 10 16:55:33 2004
From: Helio Chissini de Castro <helio () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:55:33 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Moving to SubVersion
Message-Id: <200410101355.37580.helio () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=109742737324737
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2557288.KQsmbpIPM3"

--nextPart2557288.KQsmbpIPM3
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 10 October 2004 11:30, Leo Savernik wrote:
> CVS is simply mature, does not undergo significant changes, and can simply
> be relied upon. SVN is still in flux and will change frequently. Oh, I
> already anticipate recurring statements like, "KDE rep doesnt work with s=
vn
> 1.x anymore, use 1.x+10 instead". So you will be forced to update svn
> *often*, much more often than once in a decade.
>
> Why dont we wait until SVN reaches a mature state like cvs, and switch
> then?

A 12 Gb database, 4 distro releases with more then 5000 packages was enough=
=20
stability for ust at Conectiva.
And yes, we had update a lot of times in the past, since we are one of the=
=20
oldest beta testers of subversion, but we run out of problems for a long=20
time.
Just FYI, see how we can handle out things with subversion:=20
https://moin.conectiva.com.br/RepositorySystem

[]'s

=2D-=20
Helio Chissini de Castro
KDE Developer
Brasil/South America Primary Contact

--nextPart2557288.KQsmbpIPM3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBaWmJ8KVbYLGVrvcRAtcoAKC8dWM+TN2mRS4Qc+94B/W02/vFZACgtPwp
mlnyjAIVTD/GbFUFWDsABWw=
=0c+O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2557288.KQsmbpIPM3--