From kde-core-devel  Fri Oct 08 19:19:49 2004
From: Charles Samuels <charles () kde ! org>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:19:49 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Moving to SubVersion
Message-Id: <200410082019.52670.charles () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=109726321828634
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1182342.VQHpNtriRp"

--nextPart1182342.VQHpNtriRp
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 2004 October 08 07:31 pm, Tobias Koenig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know we had this topic some times ago, but we came to no conclusion.
> So I want to ask again, when do we move the KDE repository to
> subversion?

when?

I have the opinion that subversion may not be the best solution.  Now,=20
obviously, cvs isn't the best solution either, but I think the cost of=20
switching to subversion from cvs may not be worth the return, at least=20
immediately.

I don't want to start a flamewar, and I don't want this message to be an=20
argument as to why cvs or subversion may suck, however, I want to mention=20
that switching to subversion is not the only option in either the immediate=
=20
or distant future.

=2DCharles

=2D-=20
Charles Samuels <charles@kde.org>
 Don't changes horses in the middle of an apocalypse!

--nextPart1182342.VQHpNtriRp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBZuhYWS4Pv66UcxkRAhXxAKCRZWxsr9CklqHMKHBpUePplpx2YACgx5ZK
HRTuSflTatrMxOY9Uqaozec=
=Poxl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1182342.VQHpNtriRp--