On Wednesday 29 September 2004 11:51 am, Harald Fernengel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:40, Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote:
> > a) More glib (someone please get these guys the Thinking in C++ book)
>
> nope, there's no glib dependency. The API is a bit glib-ish, but we don't
> care since we do not expose it in our wrapper.

We thought something like that about aRts, too.