From kde-core-devel  Sat Aug 14 01:16:07 2004
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock () gmx ! net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:16:07 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: HEAD is open for development again
Message-Id: <200408140316.10637.michaelnottebrock () gmx ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=109244618113535
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--Boundary-02=_afWHBcLZybYiNyO"


--Boundary-02=_afWHBcLZybYiNyO
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 14 August 2004 02:02, Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> [Nonsense]

Charles, I'm sorry for the outburst. Reading the thread more calmly, I thin=
k=20
what you're saying is both about what would be nice to have and what's doab=
le=20
now - you must understand that as a porter I'm very sensitive to what looks=
=20
as somebody promoting a huge regression (for my platform) as a value-adding=
=20
feature.=20

So please ignore that last mail and let me just say that on FreeBSD a layer=
=20
that does mixing in software and occupies one OSS device is way less of a=20
pain than it probably is for you on Linux and thus should remain as an opti=
on=20
(as you mentioned it would, but which I didn't really notice until rereadin=
g=20
the mail).

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--Boundary-02=_afWHBcLZybYiNyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBHWfaXhc68WspdLARAit/AKCDIJ1i+bjf2U1k67hmqoujksinnQCeKe0s
LgtZmNRfWCRyb3o8le8vNSo=
=pwLM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_afWHBcLZybYiNyO--