[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: ANNOUNCE: HEAD is open for development again
From:       Benjamin Meyer <ben () meyerhome ! net>
Date:       2004-08-14 0:04:50
Message-ID: 200408132004.55112.ben () meyerhome ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 13 August 2004 3:01 pm, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Friday 13 August 2004 18:41, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > >I'd like to open HEAD for normal development again with this mail. The
> > >final KDE_3_3_0_RELEASE is tagged (beside kde-i18n) and I will start
> > >preparing packages.
> >
> > I'd like to know this: are we considering the possibility of a KDE 3.4?
> > Or are we allowed to make binary incompatible changes now, thus
> > cleaning up the code for KDE 4?
>
> And if that's the case, we should probably coordinate source
> compability-breakage, since otherwise HEAD will be a real mess for a long
> time. Perhaps making a porting-doc required, to make things easier for
> folks(can be a good idea for ones belly button too..), would be a good
> idea? Then the final 3rd party porting doc will come by itself.

Good idea, considering that a porting doc needs to be written anyway, why not 
start up a file so as BIC tasks are done they can be appended to the file 
letting developers know what they need to do.  Then when it comes to release 
time someone doesn't have to spend a lot of time writing up a doc that will 
probably miss something. 

- -Benjamin Meyer

- -- 
aka icefox
Public Key: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~benjamin/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBHVck1rZ3LTw38vIRAoa/AKChjw/Snlp6X1t+ijv9oGw8j0aSJwCcDoRE
xdtQU0Kwu8DOz9JIhuHhnNM=
=5iu5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]