--Boundary-02=_i9LrA0VE8KtNNpu
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 18 May 2004 18:21, Gustavo Pichorim Boiko wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 11:27, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > any comments?
>
> Well, I saw this problem some days ago, but when I was reading the
> mountwatcher code, I saw that there are many dcop calls (and some methods
> in kio_devices) that recerences the list entries by their IDs (the positi=
on
> in the list) so I thought removing the element is not a good idea. But
> these methods aren't used so much...
>
> My opinion is that the methods which reference the entries by their IDs
> should be removed (as they aren't so much used) and only the methods which
> reference the entries by the name should remain.

The only code which is using these functions is the kio_devices. I think it=
=20
should be changed, but I want to have another opinion before doing this :)

By the way, the removeOldDevices function was wrong. I fixed it in CVS.

I want to backport Simone's patch to 3.2 branch. Does anyone have any=20
objection?

[]'s
=2D-=20
Gustavo Pichorim Boiko
=2D-
boiko @ conectiva . com . br



--Boundary-02=_i9LrA0VE8KtNNpu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBArL9iZQYlDr5VjykRAp0hAJ9K7umfaNI2tWQUkKb6zg2SnIoecACbBRhe
aqeyzYt3H+CWMuWQd2pvWAs=
=F+Di
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_i9LrA0VE8KtNNpu--