[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: A humble packager's request: Retire kdeaddons.
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-02-13 20:39:14
Message-ID: 200402132139.15381 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]


On Friday 13 February 2004 06:54, Rob Kaper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 03:19:16PM +0100, David Faure wrote:
> > Well, at least not a module which depends on other things (like
> > kdeaddons), possibly leading to cyclic dependencies.
> >
> > kdesupport, on the other hand, sounds fine - it's at the bottom of
> > the chain, and is optional if people can get taglib by other means
> > (released tarballs).
>
> Someone will come up with it at some point, so let's be the first:
> couldn't/shouldn't arts also be in there, then?

I see no reason to move arts there. What's wrong with the arts module?=20
Or do you just fear that your taglib would be lonely in kdesupport? ;-)

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]