On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 03:54:21PM +0100, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> Yes, I'm all with you, but at the moment khtml is a problem as you point out 
> already and their are probably enough other areas in kdelibs that need some 
> continued maintenance work as well. So I don't think it is practical to skip 
> kdelibs 3.3 altogether.

bookmarks for example are seen as an application / user visible
component and yet are part of kdelibs currently :(

> I'm not in favor of too much revamping for KDE 4.0 because that tends to give 
> application developers only more work to do without getting much in return. 
> It will take longer for development books to catch up, etc. etc. Having to 
> make changes for Qt4 sounds already bad enough.

/me nods

mvg,
Alex