From kde-core-devel Wed Feb 04 11:09:49 2004 From: Brad Hards Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:09:49 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: future versions (Re: [kde-announce] Announcing KDE 3.2) Message-Id: <200402042209.49467.bhards () bigpond ! net ! au> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=107589329717277 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:26 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 11:00, Brad Hards wrote: > For me there are two things that would justify a quick KDE 3.3 release for > me: - Cleaning up kcontrol in introducing the long awaited theme manager > and moving out the app specific modules (you know where I am, Scott :) - > Profile enhancements for konqueror, that were floating around shortly > before release (#74097 is just another incarnation of that wish) A release that could build and run natively on MacOS would make a case from my perspective. If the kdepim guys could make a good case for kdelibs changes, that might also support arguments for an early release. > I haven't heard about the Qt atk bridge again (and afaik it's not part of > the Qt 3.3 changelog), that would have been another reason. Harry, can you comment? > But 6 months is unrealistic. You end up with a release in august and that's > exactly the time where many of the nothern hemisphere are relaxing in the > sun and don't care about hacking. And less than 6 months is pretty > unrealistic too, taking that we spent roughly 3 months in feature freeze > for 3.2. So 7 or 8? My concern is that we wait 6 months for Qt 4, and it takes another 12 months to get KDE 4 into shape. > So I think, we still need to see how much impact Qt4 has on our code base > and then we can schedule again. Matthias, can you provide some advice here? Any updates you can provide for Qt 4? Brad -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAINL9GwwszQ/PZzgRAkV6AJ9AQ/nFoLdy6PaaGvzEZm/OWmcewQCfZf24 2Oqh7pwflUiiy6hDVIsLY4g= =WeHd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----