[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KDE Integration mailing-list and module
From: Leo Savernik <l.savernik () aon ! at>
Date: 2004-01-19 11:25:07
Message-ID: 200401191225.37862.l.savernik () aon ! at
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2004 14:25 schrieb Philippe Fremy:
[...]
> If we leverage all this integration correctly, we can really end up with
> KDE as the unifying desktop, the one in which all the applications look
> consistent.
>
> Are applications going to develop with Gtk for KDE ?
> Well, I don't think so. For somebody who runs KDE as its desktop and want
> to develop for KDE, Qt and KDE are the obvious choices. Especially if he is
> aware of kpart and dcop (and he should)
>
> People developing with Gtk usually have their reasons like they want to
> integrate in Gnome, they don't want to touch C++ or they only know Gtk. But
> many of them are quite friendly to KDE and would be willing to make
> integration into KDE easier, like the sodipodi author did. I believe that
> if a small wrapper for the main KDE dialogs is developed, many Gtk
> applications are going to use it.
It makes me think if KDE delivers the best possible integration of Gtk/Gnome
apps, what is the competitive edge for developers to develop KDE applications
any more? If you can reach both DEs with writing a Gtk/Gnome applications,
but only one DE with Qt/KDE, you can bet what happens in the future. Think
commercial vendors.
>
[...]
mfg
Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAC76Yj5jssenUYTsRAm8eAJ9vLsoOnn5Dg5lEbEsDhPFAo/XWNACfcAml
kSufXZq/yAAQlFE2aUrxuMU=
=xzI4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic