[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC: Removal of KAutoConfig / KAutoConfigDialog
From:       Benjamin Meyer <ben () meyerhome ! net>
Date:       2003-11-13 0:07:05
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 6:44 pm, Scott Wheeler wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2003 0:32, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 November 2003 3:52 pm, Scott Wheeler wrote:
> > > Uhm, question -- after there was pretty much unanimous agreement to
> > > remove this class why is Benjamin *still* porting things to it?
> > >
> > > Was there a secret reversal of opinion that I missed somewhere?
> > >
> > > -Scott
> >
> > As already stated on the cvs mailinglist:
> >
> > The "port" from KAutoConfig -> KConfig_Compiler is trivial.
>
> If it's trivial then why not do it that way in the first place?

Because KConfig_Compiler didn't exist six months ago?  Kind of hard to port to 
something that doesn't exist...

- -Benjamin Meyer


- -- 
Public Key: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~benjamin/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/sssp1rZ3LTw38vIRAvKCAJ9Ez/h8hjQVVZ7ru5qsOWlcR1i9iwCgq1XN
ZI2ULhpRDUmfpIQ6JnazWRM=
=KncH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]