On Monday 04 August 2003 14:21, Michael Ritzert wrote:
> To prevent this kind of error in the future I propose the attached patch to
> have configure check whether the correct libqt-mt.so was picked up. This patch
> is mainly intended as food for thought as I have no idea how portable the shell
> code is. I checked that it work correctly for bash on GNU/Linux in both
> possible cases (wrong/correct lib linked in).
Did you test what ldd outputs on non-Debian systems? I wouldn't trust it's
portability - especially as you name Windows yourself.

The whole test should better be removed in favor of a test if qtlib == /usr/lib,
which was the reason the check was actually added.

Greetings, Stephan