[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Commercial Free Software projects and KDE
From:       Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () babylon2k ! de>
Date:       2003-07-30 20:37:36
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 July 2003 19:32, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > No, there's two things: production environment and development codebase.
> > Like others already said, HEAD != stable.
>
> As mentioned in another subthread, I don't buy into that simplicity.
> Especially regarding stability in HEAD as base for application development.
Should external application developers not work with the "stable" versions of 
kde/qt for their developement, which means atm kde 3.1.x and qt 3.1.x ? Why 
is it interesting for external applications devs to work with head as long as 
we provide that head (for the .x releases) is bc to the old stuff ? (in the 
normal software development world you develop for existing platforms, too, 
and not for the internal development snapshots of the os companies (which 
would be HEAD for kde, as we haven't had any public beta test phase until 
now), or ?)

cu
Christoph

- -- 
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Maintainance Team
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann@kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQE/KCySyPjDGePm9UIRAr9EAKCxb5w5B6DxDkLuNGkH49P01+5etwCYwyXa
+t17ar5ZvaJWQbSKGRiJag==
=/DLY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]