From kde-core-devel  Mon Jul 28 10:32:05 2003
From: Rob Kaper <cap () capsi ! com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:32:05 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Qt 3.2 requirement
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=105938841416741
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--v0AS7uCPPFvPHUfF"


--v0AS7uCPPFvPHUfF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:14:50PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> One idea would be to be more strict about separating bug-fixes
> from new features.

We do. KDE_3_1_BRANCH vs HEAD. KDE 3.2 is a feature release, not a bug fix
release.

> If QT 3.2 is close to a bug-fix only release,=20
> it might be the right thing to switch the KDE 3.2 requirements to it.

No, if it's a bug fix release, it might be the right thing to upgrade to it=
 for KDE
3.1.4. KDE 3.2 is fair terrority..

(http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.2-release-plan.html
could use a little adjustment to work in Lynx though, the week by week of
what is allowed is tough to spot without colors and it's KDE policy not to
use colors as indication of good/bad, maybe we should apply the same to our
web family.

Rob
--=20
Rob Kaper     | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
cap@capsi.com | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

--v0AS7uCPPFvPHUfF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/JPuktppIl2G1SjcRAqx4AJ9pgrsaaabOjvVmLg3vYVy3jfnmowCgpvb8
JiY5hDEeUd8RW9F3RTNDjk4=
=WE1d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--v0AS7uCPPFvPHUfF--