From kde-core-devel  Sun Jun 15 19:43:52 2003
From: Ingo =?utf-8?q?Kl=C3=B6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:43:52 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KDE 3.2 release plan notice
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=105570712416765
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--Boundary-02=_5xM7+pqKQ1wSY49"


--Boundary-02=_5xM7+pqKQ1wSY49
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 15 June 2003 21:00, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Sunday 15 June 2003 12:59 schrieb Martijn Klingens:
> > Looking at past releases all .1 releases are what .0 should have
> > been. This=3D =3D20
> > can be achieved by releasing the final RC as RC, and branching CVS,
> > but onl=3D y=3D20
> > release the .0 roughly a month after the final RC off the branch.
> > Another=3D20
>
> Dream on! Nobody is using the RC of a .0 release, so unless you get
> the stuff in use, you don't find the real problems -> .1 releases
> will always have less bugs.

I'm pretty sure that this time many people will try the RC because of=20
Kontact. But maybe I'm also just dreaming.

Regards,
Ingo


--Boundary-02=_5xM7+pqKQ1wSY49
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+7Mx5GnR+RTDgudgRAuSVAJ9vSVuT7Vcz37MFu/2e0EGLc667XwCcDd/N
fqesdfTB7f2JjjRb7HSPIEM=
=y2/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_5xM7+pqKQ1wSY49--