[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?
From: Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date: 2003-04-29 11:06:18
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 29 April 2003 12:15, Antonio Larrosa Jiménez wrote:
<snip>
> Yep, I see. But the only difference is that STL has a unique
> algorithm. Nobody prevents anyone to implement that in the next Qt
> version or in kdecore (kde-qt-addon, whatever), and that way we would
> have a unique (how ironic :) ) naming scheme and homogeneous API,
> instead of a fragmented one.
<snip>
How much difference is there in std::unique() vs. qUnique?
And what if someone needs for_each, find_if, accumulate, generate,
sort(...,...,greater<...>)? Do you volunteer to _re_implement them for
the QTL, too?
Marc
--
Nie wird so viel gelogen wie vor der Wahl, während des Kriegs und nach
der Jagd -- Otto von Bismarck
[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic