--Boundary-02=_SsZr+VOy9t+WRsR
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 28 April 2003 20:19, George Staikos wrote:
<snip>
>    We already have std::vector equivalence in Qt.  What you are
> saying is that only things that cannot be done with Qt may be done
> with STL?  I will be interested to see this.
<snip>

Look at the case that started this thread: I use QStringList and want to=20
have std::unique() functionality. I do what I can in Qt (QStringList,=20
QStringList::sort()) and use the STL for things that cannot be done=20
with Qt (std::unique()). And no, a for loop is not a replacement.

Oh, and regarding the readability and maintainability of STL vs. QTL=20
code: Where, _please_, is the difference between

  std::copy( foo.begin(), foo.end(), bar.begin() );

and

  qCopy( foo.begin(), foo.end(), bar.begin() );

??????????

Marc

=2D-=20
It seems that the only thing worse than being an enemy of the US is
being a close friend and ally.
     -- John Horvath, "The Meaning of Friendship", Telepolis #14395

--Boundary-02=_SsZr+VOy9t+WRsR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+rZsS3oWD+L2/6DgRAuKIAKC/0VhRkR06uShDFWJinisHEQwPhACffguU
V2dFMApqJ5i6napNsjKlUmI=
=5qBE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_SsZr+VOy9t+WRsR--