[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?
From: Scott Wheeler <wheeler () kde ! org>
Date: 2003-04-28 19:26:21
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 April 2003 19:12, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> perhaps could be improved on the STL side by subclassing or
> writing more algorithms).
I'm not sure if you're referring to subclassing QTL or STL classes here, but
both are relatively difficult to subclass in a useful way since generally
their classes don't have virtual destructors.
(I have a mostly vaporware wrapper around some of the STL classes to make them
more Qt-like; I'm having to use them as member variables rather than just
subclassing.)
> PS: I personally really wonder how much QTL's implicit sharing slows (yes,
> slows) things down. Too bad I don't know how to create some useful
> representative benchmark.
I'd be interested in which contexts you're thinking about. Do you mean just
accessing everything through a pointer?
Cheers,
- -Scott
- --
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and
those who don't.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+rYBgQu0ByfY5QTkRAq0EAJ9yrhHfga6GodnnzAc8ACxyOI20kwCdEzbm
lgaG1JCYVeXMAYsIgTPDBPE=
=vDkt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic