From kde-core-devel  Wed Apr 02 19:23:38 2003
From: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart () tiscalinet ! be>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:23:38 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Is this still binary compatible?
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=104934495606622

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christoph Cullmann wrote:

>> > Why you want to add the slotChanged() ? I mean the signal is no bad
>> > idea, for sure, but the slot is useless, that is a implementation
>> > detail of the part.
>>
>> How else am i going to collect all the changes from all the UI elements?
> That can be done in the implementation, that must not be shown to public
> in the interface. like in all other interface, the signals are in there,
> the slots or where ever they are emited are not from interest.
> 

connect( sender , SIGNAL(....) , this , SIGNAL( changed() ));

no?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+izi8z58lY8jWrL0RAvS2AJ9xbygEnVT4vDLFalbU9tKXgHM5rACfVacw
tsV5F0ZZVR/UZmSn1sQhxZk=
=xBrP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----