[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: glib in kdesupport: yes or no?
From: Neil Stevens <neil () qualityassistant ! com>
Date: 2003-03-11 16:46:24
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday March 11, 2003 08:45, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 March 2003 15:38, Neil Stevens wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > I ask you: What does replacing KDE tech with plain C tech do to
> > benefit people who use KDE? Not users of GNOME apps, but users who
> > actually use the apps we ship?
>
> <snip>
>
> What example are you hinting at? The glib-in-arts debate? I thought arts
> is meant to be DE-neutral? Do where's the "KDE tech" being replaced
> here?
I'm hinting at the things Havoc has listed. The things Stefan wants us to
do, glib in arts being the first step of.
- --
Neil Stevens - neil@qualityassistant.com
"The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the sheep
thanks the shepherd as a liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the
same
act as the destroyer of liberty." -- Abraham Lincoln
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+bhLgf7mnligQOmERAkUwAJ97aNqSXknBioshzWyE1JRJIfc7wACcCtM/
06RNIe0lLrACBBq+LfW9DkA=
=i2Pj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic