From kde-core-devel  Tue Mar 11 16:45:20 2003
From: Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:45:20 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: glib in kdesupport: yes or no?
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=104740104627807
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--Boundary-02=_iKhb+fxSVOCRYKA"


--Boundary-02=_iKhb+fxSVOCRYKA
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 11 March 2003 15:38, Neil Stevens wrote:
<snip>
> I ask you:  What does replacing KDE tech with plain C tech do to
> benefit people who use KDE?  Not users of GNOME apps, but users who
> actually use the apps we ship?
<snip>

What example are you hinting at? The glib-in-arts debate? I thought arts=20
is meant to be DE-neutral? Do where's the "KDE tech" being replaced=20
here?

Marc

=2D-=20
They [RIAA,MPAA] are trying to invent a new crime:
interference with a business model.
                           --Bruce Schneier, Crypto-Gram 08/2002

--Boundary-02=_iKhb+fxSVOCRYKA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+bhKi3oWD+L2/6DgRAh9rAJ93AxGqYWblYm05xMm/1evY8X9SCQCggj17
6xr58Ono+cGcNd8NdyvLEE8=
=voqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_iKhb+fxSVOCRYKA--