-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> > > So how is the KDE requirement of kdelibs being LGPL (X11, BSD, etc,
> > > and explicitely _not_ GPL) any different?
> >
> > Have I said they should switch gnome libs to GPL ? We use qt, which
> > is GPL and our libs are lgpl, where is there the problem :/
>
> <snip>
>
> Qt surely doesn't fall into the category of libs that'd live outside of
> the gnome equivalent of kdelibs, does it?
Why not ? It lives outside kdelibs, why should it be considered to be part of 
the "gnomelibs" equivalent ? Does we consider qt to be part of kdelibs ? And 
if yes, since when ?


cu
Christoph

- -- 
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Co-Maintainer
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann@kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+bSWWyPjDGePm9UIRAmpdAJ9jzg9zzbbFx1OlvEIp4QOxus3YOQCfbpKy
uPKda5X4VwJ4vcOkWxbO+g0=
=dsdX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----