From kde-core-devel  Mon Mar 10 20:55:42 2003
From: Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:55:42 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: glib in kdesupport: yes or no?
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=104733120630078
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--Boundary-02=_hvPb+bPaQLcxu1c"


--Boundary-02=_hvPb+bPaQLcxu1c
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 10 March 2003 20:09, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 20:30, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Monday 10 March 2003 16:30, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
<snip>
> > > but don't want to link against a gpl
> > > lib, amusing, at least in my eyes :)
<snip>
> > So how is the KDE requirement of kdelibs being LGPL (X11, BSD, etc,
> > and explicitely _not_ GPL) any different?
>
> Have I said they should switch gnome libs to GPL ? We use qt, which
> is GPL and our libs are lgpl, where is there the problem :/
<snip>

Qt surely doesn't fall into the category of libs that'd live outside of=20
the gnome equivalent of kdelibs, does it?

Marc

=2D-=20
Mutig warf sich die kleine =DCberwachungskamera zwischen T=E4ter und Opfer!
                                        --Rena Tangens / FoeBuD e.V.

--Boundary-02=_hvPb+bPaQLcxu1c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+bPvh3oWD+L2/6DgRAhx5AKDJjTtmY1r4oWt0dVOYvOfAUlp0+ACeMXc4
tnFA7Dqgt9Uqziwc+RcH3BM=
=qv/p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_hvPb+bPaQLcxu1c--