[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: glib in kdesupport: yes or no?
From:       Christoph Cullmann <crossfire () babylon2k ! de>
Date:       2003-03-10 20:09:03
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 10 March 2003 20:30, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 16:30, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > In short: I think the policy "no qt lib, as it is gpl" of the gnome
> > project should be reconsidered :/ They run around as the GNU Network
> > ....... project but don't want to link against a gpl lib, amusing, at
> > least in my eyes :)
>
> <snip>
>
> So how is the KDE requirement of kdelibs being LGPL (X11, BSD, etc, and
> explicitely _not_ GPL) any different?
Have I said they should switch gnome libs to GPL ? We use qt, which is GPL and 
our libs are lgpl, where is there the problem :/

>
> Marc

- -- 
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Co-Maintainer
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann@kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+bPDjyPjDGePm9UIRAodmAJ9zoyv+HGJ2Yawiu5JvmLYQYrTy6gCfYxkd
kHr0QnquY9CKh+3+kxaox88=
=Ra6b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic