[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: glib dependancy in KDE3.x
From: Arnold Krille <kde () arnoldarts ! de>
Date: 2003-03-07 17:35:08
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Just again my little voice...
On Friday 07 March 2003 18:25, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> The question was if it's ok to depend on glib instead of copying glib into
> arts sources.
Thats right! At present time it seems to me that most people have two (if not
three) glib's installed: one inside aRts, one for gimp/gnome/xmms/etc (and
possibly one version 1.x for compatibility).
Exceptions are people not using _any_ glib-app, which can not be that much,
since most distros install glib...
So in fact Stefan tries to reduce the number of libs installed on most of the
users. And I think this is a very good reason doing it!
> And so far I have not seen a single good argument for keeping the situation
> like it is now - except for those who think that this dependency will mean
> more work for them (I don't really count that as a "good" argument though
> :).
Only Stefan has more work if he wants to keep one version in kde-common...
Arnold
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+aNhNuYLL1cDjHx0RAmzPAJ4nJDjhI9/etAwIdz+x6DrshlV/FwCeN076
AKtKoDRjChDmmU392xICfnc=
=p1SO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic