[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: glib dependancy in KDE3.x
From:       Rob Kaper <cap () capsi ! com>
Date:       2003-03-06 18:16:58
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday March 6 2003 7:08 pm, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> > In both cases, the glib dependency makes sense.
>
> STL. It's also an international standard, and not a proprietary lib. No,
> it doesn't cover  everything glib does, but it's also far more consistent
> with goals like readable/maintainable code; and we require it already
> (it's the C++ standard library)

glib probably does more than STL, otherwise Qt would have been sufficient. I 
have more often considered porting STL code to Qt (or Qt/E or TinyQ) than the 
other way around. :-)

Rob
- -- 
Rob Kaper     | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
cap@capsi.com | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Z5CdtppIl2G1SjcRAonCAJ9gPAHwF8VFIdZJi+Zet5BGBnY7iwCfYX1F
Yy6ygE+Q6YvRNaq18M/8Rvk=
=fpTi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]