From kde-core-devel Thu Mar 06 10:02:24 2003 From: Stefan Westerfeld Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:02:24 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: glib dependancy in KDE3.x X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=104694506003876 Hi! On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:32:57AM -0800, Neil Stevens wrote: > On Thursday March 06, 2003 01:03, Stefan Westerfeld wrote: > > Thus, I am considering removing the glib compatibility code from aRts, > > and depending on the real thing in the future. The question is: are > > there any objections and/or comments against doing this within the > > KDE3.x cycle (i.e. for KDE3.2)? > > The glib stuff is entirely internal to artsd right? I do not plan to expose glib at the API level, if you mean that. So the step will not introduce any g_xxx_yyy function in code that uses aRts. In other words: I plan to maintain binary compatibility, which I have committed myself to during the KDE3 development cycle. However, a dependancy is a dependancy, and as such libmcop, libartsflow, ... will gain an additional dependancy on glib-2.0. Cu... Stefan -- -* Stefan Westerfeld, stefan@space.twc.de (PGP!), Hamburg/Germany KDE Developer, project infos at http://space.twc.de/~stefan/kde *-