[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Three different tab implementations
From:       Christian Loose <christian.loose () hamburg ! de>
Date:       2003-02-01 20:28:06
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Samstag, 1. Februar 2003 20:06 schrieb Rob Kaper:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday February 1 2003 6:17 am, Neil Stevens wrote:
> > I'd rather hold off on the change.  When I wrote the above, it was when
> > the consensus seemed to support ditching one standard.  But now that my
> > option c) seems to have some acceptance, we'll see what happens. :-)
>
> He has not posted, but just to let you know: Martijn told me on Friday he
> also favors supporting in in the window manager. That is actually also my
> preference, you mistook me raising the issue for me wanting to implement it
> in as library. I did not suggest a specific implementation to keep the
> discussion broad, which seems to have succeeded.
>
> So the next step is to decide on a path to take, or rather to work on one.
> Perhaps getting in touch with the netwm body makes most sense if we want to
> pursue "c)".
>
> Rob

Not adding much to the discussion but there is also a wish for PWM-like 
tabbing mode in our bug database.
(s. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42023)

And I agree with you that we could really need some input from the netwm guys. 
:-)

Christian
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]