-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday February 1 2003 6:17 am, Neil Stevens wrote:
> I'd rather hold off on the change.  When I wrote the above, it was when the
> consensus seemed to support ditching one standard.  But now that my option
> c) seems to have some acceptance, we'll see what happens. :-)

He has not posted, but just to let you know: Martijn told me on Friday he also 
favors supporting in in the window manager. That is actually also my 
preference, you mistook me raising the issue for me wanting to implement it 
in as library. I did not suggest a specific implementation to keep the 
discussion broad, which seems to have succeeded.

So the next step is to decide on a path to take, or rather to work on one. 
Perhaps getting in touch with the netwm body makes most sense if we want to 
pursue "c)".

Rob
- -- 
Rob Kaper      | From the mountains, to the prairies         ***** =========
capzilla.net   | To the oceans, white with foam              ***** =========
unixcode.org   | GOD BLESS AMERICA                           ===============
the-amazing.us | My home sweet home                          ===============
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+PBq0tppIl2G1SjcRAqHQAKCWj1P1fXVBKg1i0IENNGV7m//bFQCcCXWh
luLNFZy1aVjmxNXp9TyrPe4=
=RQ3F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----