[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: RH BR74071 (Was: Configuring the Red Hat Linux desktop)
From: Waldo Bastian <bastian () kde ! org>
Date: 2002-09-15 5:45:07
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 14 September 2002 10:03 pm, Owen Taylor wrote:
> I'm curious - are there particular reasons why you think that
> "strip kde-" approach is better than what I suggested in:
RedHat would actually need to add "kde-".
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74071
>
> of optionally being able to specify a canonical DesktopName
> in the desktop file?
Wouldn't you get the same name collisions in this canonical namespace then
that you tried to avoid in the first place?
> Only application desktop files were renamed in our changes, not
> service desktop files, so there is a extra expense in having
> to continually tack on "kde-" and check for that in addition.
You would only have to do that if the lookup with the name that was passed
failed and the name didn't start with kde- already.
Cheers,
Waldo
- --
bastian@kde.org | SuSE Labs KDE Developer | bastian@suse.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9hB5jN4pvrENfboIRAkk3AKCeSQAhl1TFM01orrz0FlonzjjjYQCfecPr
AaJ8Ob58bEzaa5cbtqkGv2M=
=ZFrX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic