[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: bugs.kde.org -> bugzilla??
From:       leimy2k () mac ! com
Date:       2002-08-18 17:21:00
[Download RAW message or body]

I concur with Shawn.  Its good for little projects I think.
On Sunday, August 18, 2002, at 11:24 AM, Shawn Gordon wrote:

> we started using Mantis for our customers a couple months or so ago 
> because Opie was using it, but there are a fair number of problems with 
> it, and it tends to arbitrarily loose linkages between developers and 
> projects.  It's basically manageable for us, but we've already had to 
> modify the code a couple of times and we have more that we need to do.  
> I don't know that I would recommend it for KDE.
>
> Did anyone look at the Loki enhancement to Bugzilla, Fenris?
>
> At 09:20 AM 8/18/2002, you wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 August 2002 15:17, Carsten Niehaus wrote:
>> > On Sunday 18 August 2002 15:09, Daniel Naber wrote:
>> > > On Sunday 18 August 2002 11:06, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>> > > Another nice bug tracking system (written in PHP) is Mantis:
>> > > http://mantisbt.sourceforge.net/demo.php3
>> >
>> > The OPIE-Project uses Mantis 
>> (http://131.152.105.154/mantis/main_page.php)
>> > and we like it very much. The queries are very easy and it's easy to 
>> get a
>> > get overview or statistic.
>>
>> I checked mantis a bit and it seems to me not able to handle our
>> mass of bugs. you would need such a mantis per application.
>> After reading the mail from Telsa I'm even more convinced, bugzilla
>> would do us any good if we can clean up the interface for our needs
>> and kbugbuster can be ported.
>>
>> Greetings, Stephan
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shawn Gordon
> President
> theKompany.com
> www.thekompany.com
> 949-713-3276
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]