On Sunday 21 July 2002 03:49, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> given the number of SVG images in actual use on the web right now (very,
> very few) and the fact that i don't know of a single other part of KDE th=
at
> has such a "no possible way to crash it or don't release it" policy, this
> seems a little harsh and even unfair.

Given the number of SVG images in actual use right now (very, very few), I =
see=20
no reason to speed up inclusion then. And I don't know of a single other pa=
rt=20
of KDE that has a "we're more important than the release schedule" rules, i=
t=20
would be unfair to include it as well.

We can debate this indefinitely, or we can just stick to the rules. Bug Dir=
k=20
if you think the freeze is not a good idea. I think it is. Make some=20
third-party releases first. Actually, *that* would probably be a nice=20
addition to the freeze policy, requiring some public releases before=20
inclusion.

Rob
=2D-=20
Rob Kaper     | Gimme some love, gimme some skin,
cap@capsi.com | if we ain't got that then we ain't got much
www.capsi.com | and we ain't got nothing, nothing! -- "Nothing" by A