From kde-core-devel Fri Jul 12 10:26:45 2002 From: Rolf Magnus Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:26:45 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: Constructive feedback from Eugenia X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=102646908822526 On Friday 12 July 2002 03:14, Waldo Bastian wrote: > Surprisingly we already do this, what confused me though is that if there > is only one application (KPackage in my test case), we show > "Open With..." > "KPackage" > > But if there are two applications it becomes: > "Open With >" > "KWrite" > "Kompare" > --------- > "Other" > > I think such self-changing menu is confusing. Especially, the first part is missing something important. > Also, note that the > "KPackage" in the case above is redundant since the "Open in New Window" > option (Currently named "Open" here on my desktop, yay!) does the same. But wouldn't that be just the self-changing menu you're talking about? And = you=20 don't know that "Open" will open it in KPackage. I'd just expect all apps=20 that can open a file to be listed there, even if there is only one. It's ju= st=20 more consistant. > Anyway, I think it would be better to always have the menu the same, so > that the first case would look like: > "Open With >" > "KPackage" > --------- > "Other" > > I'm not sure how the "Open With" section should look like if there is no > application listed at all. Strictly speaking you wouldn't need it at all > then, because the "Open" option would act as "Open With" already anyway. Maybe let them act the same. I think it's not a good idea to remove "Open=20 With" completely in this case, but=20 "Open With >" --------- "Other" Also looks kind of stupid, even without the separator. So probably, both=20 "Open" and "Open With" should directly open the selction dialog. > In the case of kdesktop, the "Open" option (previously "Open In New > Window") could also be named "Open with " but I'm not sure if th= at > extra information is helpfull or distracting. Maybe just "Open ()", so there is a hint about which app is defaul= t.=20 I don't think it's distracting. > Should the "Open With >" submenu be located directly under the "Open" > option? Yes. =2D-=20 "The reason that you see open source there at all is because we came in and said there should be a platform that's identical with millions and millions of machines, and the BIOS of that should be open to everybody to use, and a= ll the extensibility should be there."=20 (Bill Gates)